Video Summary

Is it legal for realtors to represent both the buyer and the seller in a real estate transaction?

 

The answer to that question is: yes, it is. That’s called a transactional broker and whenever you list the property, if you’re the seller, you will sign something where they’ll disclose that they will be acting as a transactional broker rather than a seller’s broker or a buyer’s broker and from my experience that a very, very high percentage – as much as 99 percent of the residential realtors serve as transactional brokers.

 

So, they take the listing and they advertise it and if a buyer happens to call someone else or the listing agent – the same realtor – well, they can then show it to the buyer and enter into a contract. They are really not representing either party.

 

The seller pays the real estate commission and they have a duty to deal in good faith or deal in good faith with both the seller and the buyer and there’s certain things that they should or should not do as far as in that capacity.

 

A transactional broker is different than a buyer’s agent. A buyer’s agent has only loyalty to the buyer and the buyer may be obligated to pay his own agent and the transaction and that should be disclosed as far as whenever the agent goes forward with the transaction.

 

And also you have exclusive seller’s agents from time to time and in commercial transactions it’s not unusual to have a agent who is the buyer’s agent and who’s the seller’s agent, but residential transactions, it’s almost the rule rather than it’s the exception to the rule where you don’t have the real estate broker serving as a transactual broker and dealing with both the buyer and the seller and really representing neither other than dealing in good faith with both.

 

 

If you have any questions about it or need to review your listing agreement, give me a call at 727-847-2288.

 

 

 

 

Video Summary

What are the repercussions for breaching a lease agreement?

 

Well, let’s first start with the tenant. That’s usually the one that is looking to breach or move out of a lease prior to its expiration or not paying the rent.

 

So, the most common breach of a tenant of a lease agreement is where they don’t pay the rent. The landlord then has the right under the Florida Landlord Tenant Act to file a three day notice to the tenant telling them that they got three days in which to pay the rent or move out and the landlord can then sue for possession and to have the tenant removed by the sheriff.

 

That process takes about 30 to 45 days. Also, the landlord can sue the tenant for any damages or any back due rent. Depending upon the lease is how that’s to be calculated and when they calculate it, so those are the usual circumstances whenever a tenant breaches the lease, it’s for non-payment or they may violate some other rule.

 

Again, the landlord must give the tenant a certain notice, giving them, I believe, it’s seven days in order to correct the deficiency such as if they had a pet in the apartment or the house and it was in violation of the terms of the lease, well, they give a seven day notice and tell the tenant they must correct it in seven days or they’ll evict them and if they do it again, well, they will have a right to evict the tenant.

 

On the other hand, we have the landlord – let’s say that they have leased the property to the tenant and the tenant is paying the rent – this sometimes rises in the event that the landlord is sued in foreclosure and the tenant is of course sued and then they have – the question is: well, has the landlord breached the lease and the answer is: no, until the final judgement of foreclosure is entered and the property is sold and the tenants are required to leave.

 

Does the landlord breach the lease? In that event, the tenant does have a cause of action against the landlord. They could sue them for the breach of the lease and their liability for that.

 

Another circumstance where the landlord has leased the property and has decided to sell the property and the tenant is still in possession. The landlord cannot unilaterally terminate a lease. The tenant has a right to remain in possession and really it’s very difficult for the landlord to show the property, but if they do sell the property, whoever purchases it is bound by the provisions of the lease.

 

So, the landlord has a hard time breaching it other than it’s the landlord’s failure to possibly maintain the property. In that event, the tenant gives a notice to the landlord of the failure of the landlord to do the repairs or maintain the property and the tenant’s remedy is to terminate the lease and move out.

 

Again, that requires a seven day notice to the landlord giving them seven days to take care of the problem. If a landlord does not or commence then to fix these problems, well, the tenant can terminate the lease and move out.

 

So, those are some of the most common examples of and the remedies of both the landlord and the tenant as far as a breach of a particular lease. This has to do primarily with residential tenancies rather than commercial tenancies.

 

So, if you have any questions about your tenant or your landlord, give me a call at 727-847-2288.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Video Summary

 

Estate planning considerations after Medicaid approval.

The legal counsel of your elder law attorney does not end with the Medicaid approval notice. Discussions follow by planning measures should be considered by the single Medicaid applicant as well as the community spouse.


For the single Medicaid applicant family members are generally desirous and have exempt assets inheritable by operation of law. Well, what exactly does this mean?


For example, avoiding probate on the exempt homestead property may be advantageous under many circumstances. After evaluating the family’s dynamics and discussing the pros and cons, an Enhanced Life Estate Deed, also commonly referred to as a Lady Bird Deed may be a suitable planning technique for avoiding probate for real estate owned by the single Medicaid applicant.


In addition, simple convenience measures may be undertaken such as adding the beneficiary to certain designated countable assets such as bank accounts. If your power of attorney is necessary to perform these functions then you must be aware of the changes brought about by the Florida Power of Attorney Act which was effective October 1, 2011.


This is crucial because authority such as the ability to create a survivorship or beneficiary designation must have been expressed in the power of attorney created prior to October 1, 2011.
Furthermore, they must also be specifically enumerated and initialed and powers of attorney’s created after or on October 1, 2011.


In addition to the applicable items previously mentioned, planning for the community spouse and the objective of protecting against future disruption in Medicaid eligibility takes on a level of immediate need and importance.


Once of the first considerations is to ensure that the community spouse completes the asset transfers necessary to conform to the asset criteria for him or her and the institutionalized spouse long before recertification.


In addition, the community spouse should review all beneficiary designations on IRAs and change life insurance policies to ensure that the institutionalized spouse is not the beneficiary of same just in case a community spouse should pass away prior to the death of the institutionalized spouse.


In most cases the community spouse will usually require new estate planning documents because she or he may have named the ill spouse as the primary actor throughout these documents.
It must also be addressed in the estate planning documents that the community spouse may predecease the ill spouse and assets received in any self-settled trust whether it enter via those trust or a living trust will not be protected.


Consequently, a third party trust may need to be created under the community spouse’s last will and testament which will likely include many of the terms and conditions for a qualifying special needs trust and that sort of treatment.


It is also important to have the community spouse consult with an insurance agent regarding the affordability and insurability of a long term care insurance policy to see if this may be a viable planning tool for the future just in case the event does occur that the community spouse will require institutional care.


It is also important to note that Medicaid recovery efforts are governed by Florida Statue 409.910. As a generalization, recovery efforts are predominantly encountered when assets of the deceased Medicaid recipient pass through a probate proceeding.


Recovery is not warranted if the Medicaid recipient is survived by either a spouse, a minor child or an adult disabled child.


If you have any questions regarding a state planning consideration and the interplay with the Medicaid application process and approval, I would love to assist you. Please give us a call here at Waller and Mitchell at 727-847-2288.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Video Summary


Can a buyer sue a seller for a undisclosed roof leak?

 

The answer is: yes, they can. This dates back to a Florida Supreme Court case called Johnson vs. Davis. That decision is probably 20 years old or older wherein they held that any residential transaction that the seller has the duty to disclose to the buyer any matters that are not reasonably observable to the buyer that may have some impact on the value of the property.

 

So, as a result of that, the standard real estate contract that is used by realtors that’s been approved by the Florida Realtors and the Florida Bar Association has a clause in it that says that the seller has disclosed any matters that may material affect the value of the property that are not readily observable.

 

Further, if you use a realtor they have a seller disclosure form wherein they go through a series of about four or five pages asking the seller to initial one way or the other whether there’s been any problems.

 

So, if you didn’t have that in the contract and you simply used a contract that did not have a disclosure or an as is contract, the seller still has the duty to disclose any matters that are not readily observable that may have some impact on the value of the property.

 

If a buyer’s going to sue the seller then they must review the disclosures to see if the seller did in fact disclose the roof leak or any other leak.

 

Secondly, the buyer must prove that the seller knew of the roof leak because you’d have to show that it occurred or was a roof leak prior to the purchase rather than occurring later. There have been some cases whenever people weren’t aware of a particular defect – of course it’s a little harder as far a roof leak’s concerned, but as far as any defect is concerned that they’re aware of it.

 

 

Many times if you buy bank owned property the bank will put on there that they have no responsibility because they’ve never been in possession of the property and therefore are unaware of any defects and so you could not sue a seller that is not aware of these problems.

 

A roof leak usually is manifest by showing something on the interior where the ceiling has been discolored and you can show where the seller has painted over it or has had roofers or somebody else over there trying to fix it and so that you could show that they were aware that the roof was leaking and they failed to disclose it.

 

If they fill out the form that the realtor gives them and says that they haven’t had any prior roof leaks or any other problems with the property, that’s an affirmative fraud and that is another cause of action so that you can sue the seller on two different theories as far as failure to disclose a hidden defect that’s called a latent defect – either sue under the contract if it’s provided for in the standard bar contract or the realtor bar contract or as a in toward or liability.

 

It’s a form of fraud by not disclosing this matter and so the other aspect of this before you get ready to sue the seller, you need to see who the seller is. If you happened to have bought this property from an investor or an LLC, well you may be able to sue them, but you have to show they knew about it, covered it up and didn’t disclose it and also, can you get any money back out of it?

 

So, you have two remedies. One is to ask to rescind the transaction, meaning you give them back the property and you get your money back if you were would not have bought it if you were aware of it. The other one is to sue for damages to determine or you show how much it cost to fix the defect.

 

So, an answer to your question is: yes, you can sue – a buyer can sue a seller for a roof leak if they can show the seller was aware of it and the roof leak occurred prior to them purchasing the property.

 

If you have any questions about this, well give me a call at 727-847-2288.